Logo des Repositoriums

P279 - Software Engineering und Software Management 2018

https://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/21117
Auflistung nach:

Auflistung P279 - Software Engineering und Software Management 2018 nach Autor:in "Berger, Thorsten"

1 - 2 von 2
  • Konferenzbeitrag
    Efficiency of Projectional Editing
    (Software Engineering und Software Management 2018, 2018) Berger, Thorsten; Voelter, Markus; Jensen, Hans Peter; Dangprasert, Taweesap; Siegmund, Janet
    Published at International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE) 2016. Projectional editors are editors where a user's editing actions directly change the abstract syntax tree without using a parser. They promise essentially unrestricted language composition as well as flexible notations, which supports aligning languages with their respective domain and constitutes an essential ingredient of model-driven development. Such editors have existed since the 1980s and gained widespread attention with the Intentional Programming paradigm, which used projectional editing at its core. However, despite the benefits, programming still mainly relies on editing textual code, where projectional editors imply a very different --typically perceived as worse --editing experience, often seen as the main challenge prohibiting their widespread adoption. We present an experiment of code-editing activities in a projectional editor, conducted with 19 graduate computer-science students and industrial developers. We investigate the effects of projectional editing on editing efficiency, editing strategies, and error rates --each of which we also compare to conventional, parser-based editing. We observe that editing is efficient for basic-editing tasks, but that editing strategies and typical errors differ. More complex tasks require substantial experience and a better understanding of the abstract-syntax-tree structure—then, projectional editing is also efficient. We also witness a tradeoff between fewer typing mistakes and an increased complexity of code editing.
  • Konferenzbeitrag
    Projectional Editing of Product Lines
    (Software Engineering und Software Management 2018, 2018) Behringer, Benjamin; Palz, Jochen; Berger, Thorsten
    Published at International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) 2017, main research track. The features of a software product line --a portfolio of system variants --can be realized using various implementation techniques (a.k.a., variability mechanisms). Each technique represents the software artifacts of features differently, typically classified into annotative (e.g., C preprocessor) and modular representations (e.g., feature modules), each with distinct advantages and disadvantages. Annotative representations are easy to realize, but annotations clutter source code and hinder program comprehension. Modular representations support comprehension, but are difficult to realize. Most importantly, to engineer feature artifacts, developers need to choose one representation and adhere to it for evolving and maintaining the same artifacts. We present PEoPL, an approach to combine the advantages of annotative and modular representations. When engineering a feature artifact, developers can choose the most-suited representation and even use different representations in parallel. PEoPL relies on separating a product line into an internal and external representation, the latter by providing editable projections used by the developers. We contribute a programming-language-independent internal representation of variability, five editable projections reflecting different variability representations, a supporting IDE, and a tailoring to Java. We evaluate PEoPL's expressiveness, scalability, and flexibility in eight Java-based product lines, finding that all can be realized, that projections are feasible, and that variant computation is fast (<45ms on average for our largest subject Berkeley DB).