Auflistung nach Autor:in "Mirnig, Alexander G."
1 - 3 von 3
Treffer pro Seite
Sortieroptionen
- KonferenzbeitragBlinded by novelty: a reflection on participant curiosity and novelty in automated vehicle studies based on experiences from the field(Mensch und Computer 2020 - Tagungsband, 2020) Mirnig, Alexander G.; Gärtner, Magdalena; Meschtscherjakov, Alexander; Tscheligi, ManfredInteracting with a novel technology or a known technology in a novel context can influence a user's interaction with said technology in both a positive or negative way. Research is often primarily interested in capturing interaction under regular conditions, rendering such influences less desirable. Depending on the actual novelty of any given technology, such halo or novelty effects might be weaker or stronger, and thereby more difficult to mitigate. In this paper, we want to share a number of experiences related to participant curiosity and technology novelty in interaction with automated vehicles. We intend to use our experiences from several studies to open the discussion on a potential underestimation of technology novelty and its effects on user research in vehicle automation technology and want to particularly highlight the role, researchers, manufacturers, and media play in shaping such effects.
- ZeitschriftenartikelGuest Editors Introduction to the Special Issue “User-Centered Design for Automated Vehicles: HMIs, User Needs, and Preferences”(i-com: Vol. 18, No. 2, 2019) Riener, Andreas; Mirnig, Alexander G.
- ZeitschriftenartikelTrust in Automated Vehicles(i-com: Vol. 17, No. 1, 2018) Mirnig, Alexander G.; Trösterer, Sandra; Meschtscherjakov, Alexander; Gärtner, Magdalena; Tscheligi, ManfredIncreasing degrees of automation in on-road vehicles bear great potential for heightened driver safety and traffic efficiency in both the near and far future. The more the driver delegates control to the vehicle, the more salient the issue of trust in automated technology becomes. Misaligned trust can lead to mishandling of automation controls in individual instances and decreases the general acceptance of on-road automation on a broader scale. In this paper, we apply insights from trust research for dynamic web service interaction to the novel automated driving domain, in order to scope the problem space regarding trust in automated vehicles. We conclude that the appropriate communication of trustworthiness, the necessity to calibrate trust, the importance of intervention capabilities by the driver, and the unambiguous transparency of locus of control are all important aspects when in comes to understanding trust in automated vehicles.