Auflistung nach Schlagwort "Group"
1 - 2 von 2
Treffer pro Seite
Sortieroptionen
- ZeitschriftenartikelDatenschutz im Konzern(HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik: Vol. 54, No. 6, 2017) Berning, Wilhelm; Keppeler, LutzNach der neuen EU-DSGVO kann es einen oder mehrere Verantwortliche für die gesetzeskonforme Verarbeitung personenbezogener Daten geben. Ausschlaggebend ist, wer die Entscheidungsbefugnis hinsichtlich Zweck und Mittel der Verarbeitung innehat. Die Identifikation der faktischen Verantwortung und die Operationalisierung auf handelnde Menschen gestalten sich insbesondere dann schwierig, wenn in Konzernen oder Unternehmensgruppen zentrale Funktionen personenbezogene Daten verarbeiten, wie etwa eine zentrale IT- oder Personalabteilung. Welcher Konzernteil für die Umsetzung der über 30 bußgeld-bewehrten Verpflichtungen der DSGVO verantwortlich ist, ergibt sich keinesfalls von selbst. Anhand einer beispielhaften Konzernstruktur entwickelt dieser Beitrag eine Methodik, um für eine zentralisierte Verarbeitung von Mitarbeiterdaten die faktische Verantwortung mehrerer Verantwortlicher für ein und dieselbe Verarbeitung zu identifizieren und anwendbar zu machen.AbstractAccording to the new EU GDPR, there may be one or more controller for the compliant processing of personal data. The decisive factor is who holds the decision-making power with regard to the purpose and means of processing. The identification of the factual responsibility and the operationalization on acting people are particularly difficult when within groups central functions of the group process personal data, such as a central IT or personnel department. Which part of the company is responsible for the implementation of the more than 30 fined obligations of the GDPR is not by itself self-evident. Based on an exemplary group structure, this article develops a methodology to identify the factual responsibility of more than one controller for a centralized processing of employee data. The methodology shows how the joint controllers can be identified and how it is applicable.
- ZeitschriftenartikelThe Influence of Using Collapsed Sub-processes and Groups on the Understandability of Business Process Models(Business & Information Systems Engineering: Vol. 62, No. 2, 2020) Turetken, Oktay; Dikici, Ahmet; Vanderfeesten, Irene; Rompen, Tessa; Demirors, OnurMany factors influence the creation of business process models which are understandable for a target audience. Understandability of process models becomes more critical when size and complexity of the models increase. Using vertical modularization to decompose such models hierarchically into modules is considered to improve their understandability. To investigate this assumption, two experiments were conducted. The experiments involved 2 large-scale real-life business process models that were modeled using BPMN v2.0 (Business Process Model and Notation) in the form of collaboration diagrams. Each process was modeled in 3 modularity forms: fully-flattened, flattened where activities are clustered using BPMN groups, and modularized using separately viewed BPMN sub-processes. The objective was to investigate if and how different forms of modularity representation (used for vertical modularization) in BPMN collaboration diagrams influence the understandability of process models. In addition to the forms of modularity representation, the presentation medium (paper vs. computer) and model reader's level of business process modeling competency were investigated as factors that potentially influence model comprehension. 60 business practitioners from a large organization and 140 graduate students participated in our experiments. The results indicate that, when these three modularity representations are considered, it is best to present the model in a 'flattened' form (with or without the use of groups) and in the 'paper' format in order to optimally understand a BPMN model. The results also show that the model reader's business process modeling competency is an important factor of process model comprehension.