Logo des Repositoriums

Auflistung nach Schlagwort "non-functional requirements"

1 - 3 von 3
  • Konferenzbeitrag
    Aspectual predesign: extending KCPM to map non-functional requirements
    (Information systems technology and its applications, ISTA' 2005, 2005) Shekhovtsov, Vladimir A.; Kostanyan, Arkady V.
    This paper presents an extension of the Klagenfurt Conceptual Predesign Model (KCPM) allowing taking into account the non-functional requirements to the system. These requirements are treated as crosscutting concerns. This process could be also seen as an addition to the AOSD paradigm that brings the gap between the Aspect-Oriented Requirement Engineering and Aspect-Oriented Modeling. The extensions of the KCPM schema and the new mapping rules are introduced for the case of asymmetric AOSD approach.
  • Konferenzbeitrag
    Tool supported aspectual predesign
    (Information Systems Technology and its Applications, 5th International Conference ISTA 2006, 2006) Shekhovtsov, Vladimir A.; Kostanyan, Arkadiy V.; Gritskov, Eugene; Litvinenko, Yury
    Aspectual predesign is an approach to user-verified mapping of the nonfunctional requirements to the system into the aspect-oriented design model. It is an extension of the Klagenfurt Conceptual Predesign. In this paper, we present the architecture of modular software tool aiming to support the aspectual predesign workflow. The XML-based Predesign Exchange Format (PEF) for conversionindependent representation of aspectual predesign model (APM) is introduced.
  • ConferencePaper
    Views on Quality Requirements in Academia and Practice: Commonalities, Differences, and Context-Dependent Grey Areas
    (Software Engineering 2021, 2021) Vogelsang, Andreas; Eckhardt, Jonas; Mendez, Daniel; Berger, Moritz
    This article originally appeared in Information and Software Technology (IST). Context: Quality requirements (QRs) are a topic of constant discussions both in industry and academia. While many academic endeavors contribute to the body of knowledge about QRs, practitioners may have different views. Objective: We report on a study to better understand the extent to which available research statements on QRs from academic publications, are reflected in the perception of practitioners. Our goal is to analyze differences, commonalities, and context-dependent grey areas in the views of academics and practitioners. Method: We conducted a survey with 109 practitioners to assess their agreement with the selected research statements about QRs. Based on a statistical model, we evaluate the impact of a set of context factors to the perception of research statements. Results: Our results show that a majority of the statements is well respected by practitioners; however, not all of them. When examining the different groups of respondents, we noticed deviations of perceptions that lead to new research questions. Conclusions: Our results help identifying context-dependent differences about how academics and practitioners view QRs and statements where further research is useful.