Auflistung P293 - Open Identity Summit 2019 nach Titel
1 - 10 von 19
Treffer pro Seite
Sortieroptionen
- TextdokumentAnonymization Is Dead – Long Live Privacy(Open Identity Summit 2019, 2019) Zibuschka, Jan; Kurowski, Sebastian; Roßnagel, Heiko; Schunck, Christian H.; Zimmermann, ChristianPrivacy is a multi-faceted, interdisciplinary concept, with varying meaning to different people and disciplines. To most researchers, anonymity ist he “holy grail” of privacy research, as it suggests that it may be possible to avoid personal information altogether. However, time and time again, anonymization has been shown to be infeasible. Even de-facto anonymity is hardly achievable using state-of-the-art cryptographic anonymization techniques. Furthermore, as there are inherent tensions between the privacy protection goals of confidentiality, availability, integrity, transparency, intervenability and unlinkability, failed attempts to achieve full anonymization may make it impossible to provide data-subjects with transparency and intervenability. This is highly problematic as such mechanisms are required by regulation such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Therefore, we argue for a paradigm shift away from anonymization towards transparency, accountability, and intervenability.
- TextdokumentBlockchain-based consent manager for GDPR compliance(Open Identity Summit 2019, 2019) Vargas; Juan CamiloThe General Data Protection Regulation represents great challenges for companies. This paper proposes a model of consent management for personal data that uses blockchain technology to help address part of these challenges. On the one hand, the model aims to facilitate compliance with the regulation and offer an agile tool for consent control and interaction between data subjects, controllers and processors. On the other hand, it aims to offer data subjects a tool to assert their rights and get bigger control over their consents and indirectly over personal data. A proof of concept was developed using Hyperledger Fabric and allowed to identify the benefits and challenges of the model.
- TextdokumentBusiness Models for Open Digital Ecosystems of Trustable Assistants(Open Identity Summit 2019, 2019) Mihale-Wilson, Cristina; Kubach, MichaelDigital ecosystems (DEs) are self-organizing, robust and scalable environments where various stakeholders interact to solve complex problems. The idea of building digital ecosystems is not new. Thus, we can currently draw on an extensive body of literature on the topic. Although academics have addressed the technical and architectural challenges of building digital ecosystems as well as their desirability regarding innovativeness and privacy, research on how to ensure the economic viability and thus sustainability of such DEs remains scarce. In this study, we address this void in the literature and focus on the economic challenges of building open DE. We discuss this topic in the context of an open DE for trustable assistants in the Internet of Things (IoT) and vet the research question: “which are the business models an open DE must support to be economically viable?" Based on a structured research analysis we identify seven business models,which are most likely essential to the economic success of the analysed DE.
- TextdokumentDNS-based Trust Scheme Publication and Discovery(Open Identity Summit 2019, 2019) Wagner, Georg; Wagner, Sven; More, Stefan; Hoffmann, MartinTrust infrastructures are at the heart of a digital world. Within those trust infrastructures, trust schemes play an important role and often represent legal or organizational entities. Right now, trust schemes are published in the form of lists. Those lists enumerate all the trust services and their level of assurance. Trusted discovery only works if the URI of the trust list is known to the verifying party. In this paper, we introduce a Trust Scheme Publication Authority for arbitrary trust schemes. Our approach uses the Domain Name System (DNS) and its security extensions (DNSSEC) to publish discovery data securely.
- TextdokumenteIDAS eID & eSignature based Service Accounts at University environments for cross boarder/domain access(Open Identity Summit 2019, 2019) Strack, Hermann; Otto, Oliver; Klinner, Sebastian; Schmidt, AndréUniversity domain/scenario use cases based on eIDAS eID & eSignature extended user service accounts are implemented in the EU CEF projects TREATS and StudIES+, integrating hybrid ID concepts (legacy & eID). eNotar services will offer to integrate legacy binding in process and document flows, transfers to other areas are considered (Industry 4.0, ABAC).
- TextdokumentEnabling SMEs to comply with the complex new EU data protection regulation(Open Identity Summit 2019, 2019) Fähnrich, Nicolas; Kubach, MichaelThe European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) introduces privacy requirements that pose a complex challenge especially for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). In this paper, we present a software-supported process model developed by us that helps SMEs to establish processes ensuring the rights of the data subjects and prepare the documentation that is necessary to comply with the GDPR. Three small case studies illustrate the work with the process model and lessons learned from these practical applications of our tool give further insights into the topic.
- TextdokumentThe ENTOURAGE Privacy and Security Reference Architecture for Internet of Things Ecosystems(Open Identity Summit 2019, 2019) Zibuschka, Jan; Horsch, Moritz; Kubach, MichaelThe Internet of Things (IoT), with its ubiquitous sensors and actuators, enables highly useful novel use cases, notably in the field of digital assistance. It also raises unprecedented privacy and security issues. This contribution presents a reference architecture for an ecosystem of digital assistants with minimal barriers of entry, that aims to be both secure and privacy-respecting. We present concise definitions, requirements, and a layered architectural structure for IoT assistants. Moreover, we introduce privacy and security assistants building on privacy patterns such as privacy dashboard, privacy mode and security and privacy policies and interface.
- TextdokumentEvolving the DSS-X standard(Open Identity Summit 2019, 2019) Kühne, AndreasThis document describes the adoption of an existing specification (for signature creation and validation) to new challenges both in signature-specific and general technical requirements. The major work item is the need to support multiple interface description syntaxes. This document also discusses an approach of automatic document generation to provide multiple artefacts in a consistent and timely manner. This contribution wants to outline a way to maintain specifications in a changing landscape of requirements.
- TextdokumentGTPL: A Graphical Trust Policy Language(Open Identity Summit 2019, 2019) Mödersheim, Sebastian Alexander; Ni, BihangWe present GTPL, a Graphical Trust Policy Language, as an easy-to-use interface for the Trust Policy Language TPL proposed by the LIGHTest project. GTPL uses a simple graphical representation where the central graphical metaphor is to consider the input like certificates or documents as forms and the policy author describes “what to look for” in these forms by putting constrains on the form’s fields. GTPL closes the gap between languages on a logical technical level such as TPL that require expertise to use, and interfaces like the LIGHTest Graphical-Layer that allow only for very basic patterns.
- TextdokumentHow to harmonise local and remote signing(Open Identity Summit 2019, 2019) Hühnlein, Detlef; Wich, Tobias; Hühnlein, Tina; Schuberth, Sebastian; Lottes, René; Crossley, Neil; Otto, FlorianWhile the generation of qualified electronic signatures traditionally required the use of local qualified electronic signature creation devices (QSCD) in form of smart cards for example, the eIDAS-Regulation [EU14] introduced the promising option for Hardware Security Module (HSM) based QSCDs and remote signature protocols, which are especially suitable for mobile environments. As the technical interfaces of these two approaches are fundamentally different, one until today needs to choose a solution, which either supports local or remote signing but not both. In this paper we show how to harmonise the two seemingly distinct worlds in order to enable adaptive signing solutions which seamlessly allow to use both local and remote QSCDs and provide the best possible user experience for the generation of qualified electronic signatures.