Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRadloff, Michael
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, Martin
dc.contributor.authorNüttgens, Markus
dc.contributor.editorKolb, Jens
dc.contributor.editorLeopold, Henrik
dc.contributor.editorMendling, Jan
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-30T03:15:49Z
dc.date.available2017-06-30T03:15:49Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-88579-642-8
dc.identifier.issn1617-5468
dc.description.abstractConceptual models of business processes and related business process modeling languages play a crucial role in today's information systems research and practice. Common BPMLs such as BPMN 2.0 or EPC are widely accepted and applied in various domains. However, such BPMLs provide a set of generic process modeling elements but do not allow for modeling domain specific concepts. This also holds true for control means as one of the key concepts for process audits. To address this gap, this paper presents an empirically grounded extension of the EPC with modeling concepts for process-integrated control means. The results of a laboratory experiment with 58 participants demonstrate that the extension facilitates a comprehensive enactment of process audits. In conclusion, the results of this research project are contrasted with a previously designed BPMN 2.0 extension in order to present insights we gain from extending two different BPMLs with the same domain concept.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
dc.relation.ispartofEnterprise modelling and information systems architectures
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) - Proceedings, Volume P-248
dc.titleExtending different business process modeling languages with domain specific concepts: the case of internal controls in EPC and BPMNen
dc.typeText/Conference Paper
dc.pubPlaceBonn
mci.reference.pages45-58
mci.conference.locationInnsbruck
mci.conference.date3.-4. September 2015


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Show simple item record