Business process reference model languages: Experiences from BPI projects

Abstract
Natural Language is not appropriate for reference models because it risks being an in-complete, unstructured and inconsistent form of representation. This paper presents insights into a qualitative study examining both textual descriptions and semi-formal models based on ITIL. The conclusion is that a hybrid approach of models and textual extended explanations and definitions is the best approach to depicting business process reference models.
  • Citation
  • BibTeX
Taylor, C. & Probst, C., (2003). Business process reference model languages: Experiences from BPI projects. In: Dittrich, K. R., König, W., Oberweis, A., Rannenberg, K. & Wahlster, W. (Hrsg.), INFORMATIK 2003 – Innovative Informatikanwendungen, Band 1, Beiträge der 33. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI). Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.. (S. 259-263).
@inproceedings{mci/Taylor2003,
author = {Taylor, Chris AND Probst, Christian},
title = {Business process reference model languages: Experiences from BPI projects},
booktitle = {INFORMATIK 2003 – Innovative Informatikanwendungen, Band 1, Beiträge der 33. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI)},
year = {2003},
editor = {Dittrich, Klaus R. AND König, Wolfgang AND Oberweis, Andreas AND Rannenberg, Kai AND Wahlster, Wolfgang} ,
pages = { 259-263 },
publisher = {Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.},
address = {Bonn}
}
DateienGroesseFormatAnzeige
GI-Proceedings.34-40.pdf237.7Kb PDF View/Open

Haben Sie fehlerhafte Angaben entdeckt? Sagen Sie uns Bescheid: Send Feedback

More Info

ISBN: 3-88579-363-6
ISSN: 1617-5468
xmlui.MetaDataDisplay.field.date: 2003
Language: de (de)
Content Type: Text/Conference Paper
Collections

Show full item record