Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHacks, Simon
dc.contributor.authorLichter, Horst
dc.contributor.editorMayr, Heinrich C.
dc.contributor.editorRinderle-Ma, Stefanie
dc.contributor.editorStrecker, Stefan
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-14T07:16:18Z
dc.date.available2020-05-14T07:16:18Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-88579-698-5
dc.identifier.issn1617-5468
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/33143
dc.description.abstractEnterprise Architecture (EA) is no end in itself but has to provide central, important, and up-to-date information of the organization to its clients. So far, different researchers have elaborated on processes to ensure a (semi-)automated EA model maintenance. For practitioners this raises the question how the processes can be compared to each other. To answer this question, we identified a set of five quality criteria and asked EA researcher and practitioners to rate those for three processes.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
dc.relation.ispartof40 Years EMISA 2019
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) - Proceedings, Volume P-304
dc.subjectEA Model Maintenance
dc.subjectComparative Study
dc.subjectQuality Assessment
dc.subjectQuantitative Study
dc.titleQualitative Comparison of Enterprise Architecture Model Maintenance Processesen
dc.typeText/Conference Paper
dc.pubPlaceBonn
mci.reference.pages105-118
mci.conference.sessiontitleRegular Research Papers
mci.conference.locationTutzing, Germany
mci.conference.date15.-17. May, 2019


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Show simple item record