The Difference Between Graph-Based and Block-Structured Business Process Modelling Languages
Abstract
The most prominent business process notations in use today are BPMN, EPC and BPEL. While all those languages show similarities on the conceptual level and share similar constructs, the semantics of these constructs and even the intended use of the language itself are often quite different. As a result, users are uncertain when to use which language or construct in a particular language, especially when they have used another business process notation before. In this paper, we discuss the core characteristics of graph-based and block-structured modelling languages and compare them with respect to their join and loop semantics.
- Citation
- BibTeX
Kopp, O., Martin, D., Wutke, D. & Leyman, F.,
(2009).
The Difference Between Graph-Based and Block-Structured Business Process Modelling Languages.
Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures - An International Journal: Vol. 4, Nr. 1.
Berlin:
Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V..
(S. 3-13).
DOI: 10.18417/emisa.4.1.1
@article{mci/Kopp2009,
author = {Kopp, Oliver AND Martin, Daniel AND Wutke, Daniel AND Leyman, Frank},
title = {The Difference Between Graph-Based and Block-Structured Business Process Modelling Languages},
journal = {Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures - An International Journal},
volume = {4},
number = {1},
year = {2009},
,
pages = { 3-13 } ,
doi = { 10.18417/emisa.4.1.1 }
}
author = {Kopp, Oliver AND Martin, Daniel AND Wutke, Daniel AND Leyman, Frank},
title = {The Difference Between Graph-Based and Block-Structured Business Process Modelling Languages},
journal = {Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures - An International Journal},
volume = {4},
number = {1},
year = {2009},
,
pages = { 3-13 } ,
doi = { 10.18417/emisa.4.1.1 }
}
Dateien | Groesse | Format | Anzeige | |
---|---|---|---|---|
54-99-1-SM.pdf | 126.2Kb | View/ |
Sollte hier kein Volltext (PDF) verlinkt sein, dann kann es sein, dass dieser aus verschiedenen Gruenden (z.B. Lizenzen oder Copyright) nur in einer anderen Digital Library verfuegbar ist. Versuchen Sie in diesem Fall einen Zugriff ueber die verlinkte DOI: 10.18417/emisa.4.1.1
Haben Sie fehlerhafte Angaben entdeckt? Sagen Sie uns Bescheid: Send Feedback
More Info
DOI: 10.18417/emisa.4.1.1
ISSN: 1866-3621
xmlui.MetaDataDisplay.field.date: 2009
Language:
(en)

Content Type: Text/Journal Article