Zeitschriftenartikel

BDI Logics for BDI Architectures: Old Problems, New Perspectives

Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Volltext URI
Dokumententyp
Text/Journal Article
Datum
2017
Zeitschriftentitel
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Bandtitel
Quelle
KI - Künstliche Intelligenz: Vol. 31, No. 1
Verlag
Springer
Zusammenfassung
The mental attitudes of belief, desire, and intention play a central role in the design and implementation of autonomous agents. In 1987, Bratman proposed their integration into a belief–desire–intention (BDI) theory that was seminal in AI. Since then numerous approaches were built on the BDI paradigm, both practical (BDI architectures and BDI agents) and formal (BDI logics). The logical approaches that were most influential are due to Cohen and Levesque and to Rao and Georgeff. However, three fundamental problems remain up to now. First, the practical and the formal approaches evolved separately and neither fertilised the other. Second, only few formal approaches addressed some important issues such as the revision of intentions or the fundamentally paraconsistent nature of desires, and it seems fair to say that there is currently no consensical, comprehensive logical account of intentions. Finally, only few publications study the interaction between intention and other concepts that are naturally connected to intention, such as actions, planning, and the revision of beliefs and intentions. Our paper summarizes the state of the art, discusses the main open problems, and sketches how they can be addressed. We argue in particular that research on intention should be better connected to fields such as reasoning about actions, automated planning, and belief revision and update.
Beschreibung
Herzig, Andreas; Lorini, Emiliano; Perrussel, Laurent; Xiao, Zhanhao (2017): BDI Logics for BDI Architectures: Old Problems, New Perspectives. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz: Vol. 31, No. 1. Springer. PISSN: 1610-1987. pp. 73-83
Zitierform
DOI
Tags