Qualitative Comparison of Enterprise Architecture Model Maintenance Processes
dc.contributor.author | Hacks, Simon | |
dc.contributor.author | Lichter, Horst | |
dc.contributor.editor | Mayr, Heinrich C. | |
dc.contributor.editor | Rinderle-Ma, Stefanie | |
dc.contributor.editor | Strecker, Stefan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-14T07:16:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-14T07:16:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.description.abstract | Enterprise Architecture (EA) is no end in itself but has to provide central, important, and up-to-date information of the organization to its clients. So far, different researchers have elaborated on processes to ensure a (semi-)automated EA model maintenance. For practitioners this raises the question how the processes can be compared to each other. To answer this question, we identified a set of five quality criteria and asked EA researcher and practitioners to rate those for three processes. | en |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-88579-698-5 | |
dc.identifier.pissn | 1617-5468 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/33143 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. | |
dc.relation.ispartof | 40 Years EMISA 2019 | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) - Proceedings, Volume P-304 | |
dc.subject | EA Model Maintenance | |
dc.subject | Comparative Study | |
dc.subject | Quality Assessment | |
dc.subject | Quantitative Study | |
dc.title | Qualitative Comparison of Enterprise Architecture Model Maintenance Processes | en |
dc.type | Text/Conference Paper | |
gi.citation.endPage | 118 | |
gi.citation.publisherPlace | Bonn | |
gi.citation.startPage | 105 | |
gi.conference.date | 15.-17. May, 2019 | |
gi.conference.location | Tutzing, Germany | |
gi.conference.sessiontitle | Regular Research Papers |
Dateien
Originalbündel
1 - 1 von 1
Lade...
- Name:
- EMISA_2019_09_Hacks.pdf
- Größe:
- 275.1 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format