Schlett, TorstenRathgeb, ChristianTapia, Juan E.Busch, ChristophBrömme, ArslanDamer, NaserGomez-Barrero, MartaRaja, KiranRathgeb, ChristianSequeira Ana F.Todisco, MassimilianoUhl, Andreas2022-10-272022-10-272022978-3-88579-723-4https://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/39710Face image quality assessment algorithms attempt to estimate the utility of face images for biometric systems, typically face recognition, since the performance of these systems can be limited by the image quality. Hand-crafted quality score fusion has previously been examined for a variety of mostly factor-specific quality assessment algorithms. This paper instead examines score fusion for various recent “monolithic” quality assessment deep learning models. The evaluation methodology is based on Error-versus-Reject-Characteristic partial-Area-Under-Curve values, which are used to quantitatively rank quality assessment configurations in a face recognition context. Mean quality score fusion configurations were found to slightly improve performance on the TinyFace database, while the tested fusion types were ineffective on the LFW database.enBiometricsface image quality assessmentfusionface recognitionText/Conference Paper10.1109/BIOSIG55365.2022.98970321617-5499