Graefe, GoetzKimura, HideakiSeidl, ThomasRitter, NorbertSchöning, HaraldSattler, Kai-UweHärder, TheoFriedrich, SteffenWingerath, Wolfram2017-06-302017-06-302015978-3-88579-635-0B-trees have been ubiquitous for decades; and over the past 20 years, record-level locking has been ubiquitous in b-tree indexes. There are multiple designs, each a different tradeoff between (i) high concurrency and a fine granularity of locking for updates, (ii) efficient coarse locks for equality and range queries, (iii) run time efficiency with the fewest possible invocations of the lock manager, and (iv) conceptual simplicity for efficient development, maintenance, and testing. A new design introduced here is efficient and simple yet supports both fine and coarse granularities of locking. A lock request may cover (i) a gap (open interval) between two (actual) key values, (ii) a key value with its entire list of (actual and possible) row identifiers (in a non-unique secondary index), (iii) a specific pair of key value and row identifier, or (iv) a distinct key value and a fraction of all (actual and possible) row identifiers. Using specific examples such as insertions, deletions, equality queries, and phantom protection, case studies compare four prior b- tree locking techniques and the new one. Experiments show that the new technique reduces the number of lock requests yet increases transactional concurrency, improving transaction throughput for both read-only and read-write transactions. The case studies and the experiments suggest that new b-tree implementations as well as existing ones ought to adopt the new locking techniques.enText/Conference Paper1617-5468