Logo des Repositoriums
 

Counterexample guided abstraction refinement of product-line behavioural models

dc.contributor.authorCordy, Maxime
dc.contributor.authorHeymans, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorLegay, Axel
dc.contributor.authorSchobbens, Pierre-Yves
dc.contributor.authorDawagne, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorLeucker, Martin
dc.contributor.editorKnoop, Jens
dc.contributor.editorZdun, Uwe
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-21T07:37:19Z
dc.date.available2017-06-21T07:37:19Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThe model-checking problem for Software Products Lines (SPLs) is harder than for single systems: variability constitutes a new source of complexity that exacerbates the state-explosion problem. Abstraction techniques have successfully alleviated state explosion in single-system models. However, they need to be adapted to SPLs, to take into account the set of variants that produce a counterexample. In this paper, we recall the main ideas of a paper published elsewhere that applies CEGAR (Counterexample-Guided Abstraction Refinement) and desings new forms of abstraction specifically for SPLs. Experiments are carried out to evaluate the efficiency of our new abstractions. The results show that our abstractions, combined with an appropriate refinement strategy, hold the potential to achieve large reductions in verification time, although they sometimes perform worse.en
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-88579-646-6
dc.identifier.pissn1617-5468
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
dc.relation.ispartofSoftware Engineering 2016
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) - Proceedings, Volume P-252
dc.titleCounterexample guided abstraction refinement of product-line behavioural modelsen
dc.typeText/Conference Paper
gi.citation.endPage80
gi.citation.publisherPlaceBonn
gi.citation.startPage79
gi.conference.date23.-26. Februar 2016
gi.conference.locationWien

Dateien

Originalbündel
1 - 1 von 1
Lade...
Vorschaubild
Name:
79.pdf
Größe:
27.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format